What are South Carolina's insurance claim laws? A valued-policy state with old, sharp teeth.

The valued-policy law, fee-shifting for wrongful refusal, and South Carolina's current public-adjuster protections — quoted in full and linked to the official sources. Licensed in all 46 South Carolina counties, SC #17295985.

Free and confidential. Not every claim qualifies — three taps tells you if yours does.

The short answer: South Carolina is a valued policy state — a building totally destroyed by fire is owed the full amount on the policy's face (§ 38-75-20). Insurer misconduct runs into the improper claim practices statute (§ 38-59-20), its penalties (§ 38-59-30), and a statute that shifts your attorney's fees onto a carrier whose refusal to pay was unreasonable (§ 38-59-40). Public adjusting requires a license under the current Chapter 92, which caps compensation and reimbursement at 10% and prohibits advance payment (§ 38-92-120(E)).

Face valueowed on a total fire loss — the valued policy rule
S.C. Code § 38-75-20
1933the decision that helped found insurer bad-faith liability
Tyger River Pine Co.
Fee shiftattorney's fees on an unreasonable refusal to pay
S.C. Code § 38-59-40
10%maximum compensation and reimbursement, with no advance payment
S.C. Code § 38-92-120(E)

South Carolina claim law in one pass

South Carolina's rules live in three places: a valued-policy statute that fixes what a total fire loss is worth, a set of conduct statutes that police how insurers handle claims, and a licensing chapter that controls who may represent you.

The valued policy. S.C. Code § 38-75-20 is the state's bluntest protection: when a building insured against fire is totally destroyed by fire, the insurer owes the amount written on the policy. Not an adjusted number, not a depreciated one — the face amount. Carriers underwrite that value when they take the premium, and the statute holds them to it when the worst happens.

The conduct rules. S.C. Code § 38-59-20 defines improper claim practices — the recognizable repertoire of misrepresenting coverage, failing to investigate, and refusing reasonable settlements — with penalties under § 38-59-30. When a carrier's refusal to pay crosses into unreasonable, § 38-59-40 can shift the policyholder's attorney's fees onto the insurer. Behind all of it stands Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty (1933) — the South Carolina decision that established insurer liability for bad-faith refusal to settle and became a foundation the rest of the country built on. Straight talk: the bad-faith action itself is a lawsuit, filed by a policyholder attorney; a public adjuster's job is the documented record that wins it.

Who may represent you. Act 209 of 2026 created the current S.C. Code ch. 38-92. Public adjusting now requires a license (§ 38-92-20); compensation and reimbursement may not exceed 10%, and no advance payment is allowed (§ 38-92-120(E)). Contracts must contain the statutory terms (§§ 38-92-130(A)-(B)), and a separate claim-process disclosure must be given before signature (§ 38-92-130(F)). The insured may rescind within five business days, with anything of value returned within fifteen business days after notice (§§ 38-92-130(I)-(J)). A repair contractor may not evade the licensing rules through a power of attorney (§ 38-92-130(K)), and unlicensed public-adjuster activity is a fraudulent insurance act (§ 38-92-140). The chapter also requires objectivity and complete loyalty to the insured (§ 38-92-170).

If the policy contains an applicable appraisal clause and the dispute falls within the valuation questions assigned to the panel, either party may demand appraisal under that clause. Harwell v. Home Mutual (1956) held the insured's action premature on its particular clause and record after the insured refused the insurer's demand. Our South Carolina appraisal guide walks the sequence.

Read the statutes in full

Every South Carolina authority cited above sits on our shelf, complete and linked to official sources:

The South Carolina lines that surprise people

The valued-policy surprise cuts the policyholder's way. After a total fire loss, carriers sometimes reach for depreciation math out of habit. In South Carolina that argument is over before it starts: the statute fixes the recovery at the policy's face amount. If a carrier is recalculating a total fire loss downward, it is arguing against the code section itself — read it in full.

The current public-adjuster chapter is built around clean roles and informed consent. The person handling public-adjuster work must be licensed; a repair contractor cannot get around that rule through a power of attorney. The fee is capped, advance payment is barred, the contract and separate disclosure must explain the arrangement, and the public adjuster owes complete loyalty to the insured. We are the public adjuster and never the contractor — the separation is the point, and it is why contractors across our footprint hand us the claim side of their book instead of touching it themselves.

Wherever your property sits, read the policy's own suit deadline when a claim goes sideways. Do not assume negotiations extend it; the policy and governing law control, and deadline questions belong with counsel.

The South Carolina decisions that decide these fights

Statutes set the rules; courts say what they mean. Every decision below is published here in the court's own words — the complete opinion, not a summary, with no firm commentary added. All 44 are free to read in the South Carolina case-law collection.

2023 · Valuation & depreciation · AppraisalWiggins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyECF No. 140Read the decision →2022 · Assignment of benefits · Coverage & exclusionsPCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Continental Casualty CompanyRead the decision →2022 · Appraisal · Valuation & depreciationWiggins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyECF No. 41Read the decision →2021 · Valuation & depreciation · Replacement costMiriam Butler, individually, and Evelyn Stewart, in her capacity as personal representative of Joseph Stewart, and both on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, and The Standard Fire Insurance Company, Defendants.Read the decision →2013 · Coverage & exclusionsBennett & Bennett Construction, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyRead the decision →2013 · Assignment of benefitsNarruhn v. Alea London LimitedRead the decision →2010 · Coverage & exclusionsM & M Corporation of South Carolina v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyRead the decision →2009 · Coverage & exclusions · CausationSouth Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. DurhamRead the decision →2009 · Coverage & exclusionsSuper Duper Inc. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyRead the decision →2008 · Coverage & exclusionsAmerican Credit of Sumter, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyRead the decision →2003 · Coverage & exclusionsSouth Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. OatesRead the decision →2003 · Valuation & depreciation · Coverage & exclusionsSchulmeyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyRead the decision →2002 · Bad faithMixson, Inc. d/b/a The General Store v. American Loyalty Insurance CompanyRead the decision →2002 · Exclusions & coverageOcean Winds Council of Co-Owners, Inc. v. Auto-Owner Insurance CompanyRead the decision →2001 · Post-loss dutiesSouth Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v. William A. Kelly and Edward Glenn Kelly, Defendants, of whom William A. Kelly is, AppellantRead the decision →2001 · Coverage & exclusions · Bad faithSunex International, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company of IllinoisRead the decision →2000 · Coverage & exclusionsState Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. BarrettRead the decision →1999 · Coverage & exclusionsMGC Management of Charleston, Inc. v. Kinghorn Insurance AgencyRead the decision →1996 · Bad faithCock-N-Bull Steak House, Inc. v. Generali Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1996 · Bad faith · Claim handlingTadlock Painting Company v. Maryland Casualty CompanyRead the decision →1994 · Coverage & exclusionsGreenville County v. Insurance Reserve FundRead the decision →1994 · Post-loss dutiesSidney Puckett v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1993 · Coverage & exclusionsUSAA Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. RowlandRead the decision →1992 · Bad faith · Claim handlingCrossley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1988 · CausationRichard E. Carter, Appellant v. American Mutual Fire Insurance Company, RespondentRead the decision →1986 · Fraud & misrepresentationMelia R. Johnson v. South State Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1985 · Fraud & misrepresentationCharles McCracken and Carol McCracken v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1983 · Bad faithCarter v. American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1983 · Coverage & exclusionsGambrell v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesRead the decision →1983 · Bad faithLarry O. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1977 · Coverage & exclusionsSloan Construction Co., Inc. v. Central National Insurance Company of OmahaRead the decision →1976 · Coverage & exclusionsYarborough v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1975 · Coverage & exclusionsThe Torrington Company v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyRead the decision →1967 · Replacement cost · Valuation & depreciation · Exclusions & coverageThe COLUMBIA COLLEGE, Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE COMPANY, RespondentRead the decision →1966 · Coverage & exclusionsBlanton v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1966 · Appraisal · Valuation & depreciationHendricks v. American Fire & Casualty CompanyRead the decision →1963 · Post-loss dutiesA. E. Graham, d/b/a Graham's Grill v. Aetna Insurance Company, Globe & Republic Insurance Company of America, The Eagle Fire Company of New York, and Pearl Assurance Company, Ltd.Read the decision →1961 · Appraisal · Valuation & depreciationChilds v. Allstate Insurance CompanyRead the decision →1961 · Appraisal · Coverage & exclusionsMiller v. British America Assurance CompanyRead the decision →1961 · Valuation & depreciation · Replacement cost · Exclusions & coverage · CausationSOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., AppellantsRead the decision →1958 · Post-loss dutiesAmerican Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. GreenRead the decision →1956 · Appraisal · Post-loss dutiesHarwell v. Home Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Read the decision →1935 · AppraisalL. D. Jennings Co., Inc., et al. v. North River Insurance Co.Read the decision →1933 · Bad faithTyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Read the decision →

Questions South Carolina policyholders ask us

What is a valued policy state, and is South Carolina one?

Yes. Under S.C. Code § 38-75-20, when a building insured against fire is totally destroyed by fire, the insurer owes the full amount stated on the policy — not a depreciated recalculation after the fact. The number on the declarations page is the number, and the time to argue about a building's value was when the policy was written, not after it burned.

Can my roofing contractor negotiate my insurance claim in South Carolina?

A contractor may discuss the repair work, but public adjusting is licensed work under S.C. Code § 38-92-20. A property repair contractor may not sidestep that licensing requirement by taking a power of attorney (§ 38-92-130(K)). Your contractor builds. A licensed public adjuster prepares, presents, and negotiates the claim.

Does South Carolina have a bad-faith law?

South Carolina helped invent the field: Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty (1933) established an insurer's liability for bad-faith refusal to settle, decades before most states followed. Today the pressure points are the improper claim practices statute (S.C. Code § 38-59-20), its penalty provision (§ 38-59-30), and a fee-shifting statute (§ 38-59-40) that puts the policyholder's attorney's fees on an insurer whose refusal to pay was unreasonable. The bad-faith suit itself is attorney work — our job is building the documented record that makes it winnable.

How does the appraisal clause work in South Carolina?

If the policy contains an applicable appraisal clause and the dispute falls within the valuation questions assigned to the panel, either party may demand appraisal under that clause. Harwell v. Home Mutual (1956) held the insured's action premature on its record because the policy made a demanded appraisal a condition precedent and the insured refused. The exact policy and claim record control; our South Carolina appraisal guide covers the sequence.

Written by Joshua Friedman, founder & lead public adjuster, Friedman & Associates Public Adjusters — licensed in Georgia, Tennessee, and South Carolina. This page is general information, not legal advice; statutes are quoted from and linked to the official sources in our Reading Room.

This is a fight you shouldn't run alone. A free, confidential case review by a licensed public adjuster takes four quick moves — and if we take the case, you pay nothing unless we recover.

See if my case qualifies 877-650-3515
No recovery, no fee

See if your case qualifies.

Not every claim qualifies. Four quick moves to find out if yours does. Zero obligation, answered fast by a licensed public adjuster.

Step 1 of 4Private claim review
Your review outlineThree details to organize
01PropertyChoose
02LossWaiting
03StatusWaiting
04Private reviewFinal move

What kind of property is involved?

Choose the closest fit for this claim.

What happened to your property?

Where does the claim stand?

Your private reviewYour review outline is ready.

Three essential details organized. One final move tells us where to respond.

Where should we reach you?

Tell us where the property is and how you prefer to hear from us.

How should we contact you?
Add insurance company or claim details (optional)

Please don't include policy numbers, Social Security numbers, medical information, or other sensitive identifiers.

Private and no obligation. We won’t contact your insurer without your direction.

Prefer to talk now? Call 877-650-3515.
Case review referenceFA-26-····

Your case review is ready to send.

Name Property type Loss Claim status Property Qualification review by The partners, directly

Filing your review with our office… Nothing ever goes to your carrier from this page. On a computer? Email it instead.

While you wait: three things never to say to your carrier
  1. “It’s probably been like that a while.” State only what you know. Guessing at timelines can hand the carrier a wear-and-tear argument.
  2. “We’re fine, it’s not that bad.” The full scope is not known until it is documented. Don’t minimize damage on a recorded line.
  3. “Sure, I’ll give a recorded statement now.” One innocent guess can follow the claim. Get advice before committing to a formal account.
Free claim reviewTalk to a Public Adjuster Today